Home > Absence of Jurisdiction, Art of Counter-CyberForensics, Bifurcation Theory, Blog, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem Codes, Breach of Expert Duties, Breach of Natural Justice, Breach of Prosecution's Duties, Brute-Force Attack, Case Law Studies, Chain of Custody, Chain of Evidence, Chaos Theory, Code Breakers, Conspiracy Theory, Control, Credibility of Expert Witness, Criminal & Civil Liability of Expert Witness, Criminal Behavioral Studies, Criminal Justice, Criminal Procedures Code (Act 593) - Malayan Law, Criminology, Cryptanalysis, Cryptography, Custody, Cyber Forensics & Investigations, Damages, Data Analyses, Definition of Possession in Law, Domain Names, E-mail, Electronic Evidence, Error-Correcting Codes, Evidence Act 1950 (Malayan Law), Evidence Not Marked As Exhibit, Expert At Crime Scene, Expert Evidence, Expert Witness, Failure of Gaussian Hypothesis, Federal Constitutions, Fibonacci Numbers, First Information Report (FIR), Fluid Dynamics, Forensics Standards, FOREX THEORY, Fractal Market Analysis, Fractal Market Hypothesis, Fractal Time Series, Freedom and Privacy, Freedom of Thought, Fundamental Human Rights, Fuzzy Sets, Game Theory, Gaussian and Non-Gaussian, Gazetted Expert Witness, Geological Forensics Science, Human Rights, Illegally Obtained Evidence, Information, Intellectual Properties & Copyrights, Invasion of Privacy, Jurisdictions of Syariah Courts, Knowledge, Laminar Flow, Law of Tort, Limitation of Immunity of Judge in Lower Court, Limitations to The Immunity Rule, Lyapunov Exponent, Malicious Prosecution, Manner in which lack of competency may rise, Marriage & Privacy, Marriage Rights, Mathematical Chess Strategies, Mathematical Theory of Nothing, MD5, Measures of Central Tendency, Measures of Determinism, Measures of Dispersion, Measures of Fuzziness, Measures of Nothingness, Measures of Stochasticity, Meteorological Sciences and Analyses, My Young Padawans on The Moves, Natural Justice, Networking and Internet, Neural Fuzzy, Noisy Chaos vs R/S Analysis, Null Set Theory, Number Theory, One-Way Hash Functions, Padawan, Penal Codes, Perturbation Theory, Power and Privacy, Private Property, Private Spaces, Prosecution, Qualitative Analysis, Quantitative Analysis, Reed-Solomon Codes, Retrospective of Privacy, S 120 Parties to Civil Suits and Wives and Husbands, S1 Evidence Act 1950, S10 Evidence Act 1950, S11 Evidence Act 1950, S12 Evidence Act 1950, S122 Evidence Act (Communication During Marriage), S13 Evidence Act 1950, S14 Evidence Act 1950, S15 Evidence Act 1950, S16 Evidence Act 1950, S17 Evidence Act 1950, S2 Evidence Act 1950, S3 Evidence Act 1950, S4 Evidence Act 1950, S44 Fraud or Collusion in Obtaining Judgement or Incompetency of Court May Be Rise, S45 Evidence Act 1950, S5 Evidence Act 1950, S56 Fact Judicially Noticeable Need To Be Proved, S57 Facts of Which Court Must Take Judicial Notice, S6 Evidence Act 1950, S65 Evidence Act 1950, S65(1)(c) Evidence Act 1950, S7 Evidence Act 1950, S8 Evidence Act 1950, S9 Evidence Act 1950, S93 Exclusion of Evidence To Explain or Amend Ambigious Document, Scientific Evidence and Law, Secret of The Bodies, Secure Communications, Self-Perturbation, Self-Perturbed Prime Numbers, SHA-1, Solar and Lunar Calculations, Territories of Selfness, The Algorithms, The Daubert Test, The Dyas Test, The Frye Test, The Hurst Processes, The Jacobetz Refinement, The Kelly-Frye Test, The Kumho Gloss, The Non-linear Algorithms, The Post-Daubert Decisions, The Source Codes, The Spiral of Archimedes, The Spiral of Fibonacci, The Theory of Pure Democracy, The Williams Departure, Trial Within Trial, True Definition of Natural Justice, Turbulence, Vicarious Liability, Websites, Without Search Warrant > MYR313,713,713,713.13 – On Self-Agitated (Self-Perturbed) Prime Numbers of My Civil Suit Dated 6.3.2014 (March 6, 2014): Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim v Attorney-General (Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail) and Government of Malaysia plus Anors (Norina Zainol Abidin, Inspektor Siti Mazira Zakaria, Inspektor Mohd Razif Md Zahid, Mazelan Jamaluddin, Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli, Nur Wahida Md Khairuddin and Zaki Asyraf Zubir). The Philosophy of Mathematics (Mother of All Sciences and Human Thoughts) vs The Philosophy of Law (The Jurisprudence / Scientia Juris (Juristic Theories)). This Civil Suit is About Such A Totally and Purely Malicious Prosecution Had Happened with Absence of All Jurisdiction That Crowning (On Top Of It) The Criminal Trial before “Super-Glamour-You-Magistrate” Zaki Asyraf Zubir. Method of Attack is Based On Deontological Dialectic Approaches (Used by Karl Marx, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Sir Karl Popper and etc.) That Related To Logic and Its Philosophical Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Being, Absence and Nothingness (Nihilism – The Mathematical Theory of Nothing vs Absence of All Jurisdiction), (The Philosophy of Null Set Theory vs The Nullity (Void) of Malaysian Federal Constitution): Socrates, Euclid of Alexandria, Plotinus, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas, Avicenna (Ibnu Sina – Alī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Sīnā), Ibn Arabi (Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn al-ʿArabī al-Ḥātimī aṭ-Ṭāʾī ), Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Francisco Suárez, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, Baruch Spinoza (born Benedito de Espinosa), Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, René Descartes, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, John Locke FRS, David Hume, Bertrand Arthur William Russell The 3rd Earl Russell, Willard Van Orman Quine, Paul Celan, Jacques Derrida, Jean-Paul Sartre, Alfred Thompson “Tom” Denning, Baron Denning OM PC DL QC, . Want of / Lack of / Absence of Scientific Laws (or Theories / Principles) and Evidence: Scientific Evidence – Scientific Testimonies – Expert Evidence – The Logic of Scientific Discoveries – The Metaphysics of Scientific Phenomena – The Epistemology of Scientific Observations (Empirical Observations / Scientific Methodology / Scientific (or Mathematical) Induction and Deduction: Euclid of Alexandria, Plato, Aristotle, Ibn Haytham – Alhazen (Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham), Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Fārābī (al-Fārābī / Alpharabius), Abū ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī (Algoritmi or Algaurizin – where the word “algorithm” basically came from), Abū al-Rayhān Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Bīrūnī, Abu Mūsā Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), Muhammad ibn Zakariyā Rāzī (Rhazes or Rasis), Roger Bacon O.F.M., The Bernoullis (The Bernoulli family), Sir Karl Popper, Jules Henri Poincaré, Charles Sanders Peirce, Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz, Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann, Thomas Samuel Kuhn, Albert Einstein, Niels Henrik David Bohr, Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger, Ian Hacking CC FRSC FBA, Aleksandr Mikhailovich Lyapunov, Hilary Putnam, Pierre-Simon marquis de Laplace (Celestial Mechanics), Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo, Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, Andrey (Andrei) Andreyevich Markov, James Clerk Maxwell FRS FRSE, Ernst Waldfried Josef Wenzel Mach, Bruce Schneier (The Shifu of Cryptography) – Rationalistic Theology, Skepticism, Logical Positivism, Legal Positivisim, Positivism, – Comte, (Isidore-) Auguste (-Marie-François-Xavier), Theology (a priori) ==> Rationalistic Theology ==> Metaphysical Theology ==> Metaphysics ==> Scientific Metaphysics ==> Scientific / Empirical Observations ==> Positivism ==> Logical Positivism ==> Legal Positivism ==> (Positivism vs Realism) ==> Logical Realism ==> Scientific / Legal Realism ==> “Absolute” Realism (a posteriori) – “Keadilan ialah Meletakkan Kebenaran di Tempat Yang Sepatutnya”.

MYR313,713,713,713.13 – On Self-Agitated (Self-Perturbed) Prime Numbers of My Civil Suit Dated 6.3.2014 (March 6, 2014): Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim v Attorney-General (Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail) and Government of Malaysia plus Anors (Norina Zainol Abidin, Inspektor Siti Mazira Zakaria, Inspektor Mohd Razif Md Zahid, Mazelan Jamaluddin, Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli, Nur Wahida Md Khairuddin and Zaki Asyraf Zubir). The Philosophy of Mathematics (Mother of All Sciences and Human Thoughts) vs The Philosophy of Law (The Jurisprudence / Scientia Juris (Juristic Theories)). This Civil Suit is About Such A Totally and Purely Malicious Prosecution Had Happened with Absence of All Jurisdiction That Crowning (On Top Of It) The Criminal Trial before “Super-Glamour-You-Magistrate” Zaki Asyraf Zubir. Method of Attack is Based On Deontological Dialectic Approaches (Used by Karl Marx, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Sir Karl Popper and etc.) That Related To Logic and Its Philosophical Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Being, Absence and Nothingness (Nihilism – The Mathematical Theory of Nothing vs Absence of All Jurisdiction), (The Philosophy of Null Set Theory vs The Nullity (Void) of Malaysian Federal Constitution): Socrates, Euclid of Alexandria, Plotinus, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas, Avicenna (Ibnu Sina – Alī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Sīnā), Ibn Arabi (Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn al-ʿArabī al-Ḥātimī aṭ-Ṭāʾī ), Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Francisco Suárez, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, Baruch Spinoza (born Benedito de Espinosa), Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, René Descartes, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, John Locke FRS, David Hume, Bertrand Arthur William Russell The 3rd Earl Russell, Willard Van Orman Quine, Paul Celan, Jacques Derrida, Jean-Paul Sartre, Alfred Thompson “Tom” Denning, Baron Denning OM PC DL QC, . Want of / Lack of / Absence of Scientific Laws (or Theories / Principles) and Evidence: Scientific Evidence – Scientific Testimonies – Expert Evidence – The Logic of Scientific Discoveries – The Metaphysics of Scientific Phenomena – The Epistemology of Scientific Observations (Empirical Observations / Scientific Methodology / Scientific (or Mathematical) Induction and Deduction: Euclid of Alexandria, Plato, Aristotle, Ibn Haytham – Alhazen (Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham), Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Fārābī (al-Fārābī / Alpharabius), Abū ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī (Algoritmi or Algaurizin – where the word “algorithm” basically came from), Abū al-Rayhān Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Bīrūnī, Abu Mūsā Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), Muhammad ibn Zakariyā Rāzī (Rhazes or Rasis), Roger Bacon O.F.M., The Bernoullis (The Bernoulli family), Sir Karl Popper, Jules Henri Poincaré, Charles Sanders Peirce, Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz, Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann, Thomas Samuel Kuhn, Albert Einstein, Niels Henrik David Bohr, Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger, Ian Hacking CC FRSC FBA, Aleksandr Mikhailovich Lyapunov, Hilary Putnam, Pierre-Simon marquis de Laplace (Celestial Mechanics), Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo, Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, Andrey (Andrei) Andreyevich Markov, James Clerk Maxwell FRS FRSE, Ernst Waldfried Josef Wenzel Mach, Bruce Schneier (The Shifu of Cryptography) – Rationalistic Theology, Skepticism, Logical Positivism, Legal Positivisim, Positivism, – Comte, (Isidore-) Auguste (-Marie-François-Xavier), Theology (a priori) ==> Rationalistic Theology ==> Metaphysical Theology ==> Metaphysics ==> Scientific Metaphysics ==> Scientific / Empirical Observations ==> Positivism ==> Logical Positivism ==> Legal Positivism ==> (Positivism vs Realism) ==> Logical Realism ==> Scientific / Legal Realism ==> “Absolute” Realism (a posteriori) – “Keadilan ialah Meletakkan Kebenaran di Tempat Yang Sepatutnya”.

“Keadilan ialah Meletakkan Kebenaran di Tempat Yang Sepatutnya” – October 2011 Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim. – (In Bahasa Malaysia)

Article 145(3) Federal Constitution of Malaysia:

Article 145(3): The Attorney General shall have power, exercisable at his discretion, to institute, conduct or discontinue any proceedings for an offence, other than proceedings before a Syariah court, a native court or a court-martial.

Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.” Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

Act 620 FILM CENSORSHIP ACT 2002 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006

Prosecution 43. No prosecution in respect of any offence under this Act or any regulations made under this Act shall be instituted except by or with the written consent of the Public Prosecutor.

______________________________________________________

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR

(BAHAGIAN SIVIL)

GUAMAN SIVIL NO.                                             TAHUN 2014

ANTARA

MOHAMAD IZAHAM BIN MOHAMED YATIM                                … PLAINTIF

 

DAN

 1.                  NORINA BINTI ZAINOL ABIDIN

2.                  INSPEKTOR SITI MAZIRA BINTI ZAKARIA

3.                  INSPEKTOR MOHD RAZIF BIN MD ZAHID

4.                  MAZELAN BIN JAMALUDDIN

5.                  NURUL ASHIQIN BINTI ZULKIFLI

6.                  NUR WAHIDA BINTI MD. KHAIRUDDIN

7.                  TAN SRI ABDUL GANI PATAIL, PEGUAM NEGARA

8.                  ZAKI ASYRAF BIN ZUBIR

9.                  KERAJAAN MALAYSIA                                   … DEFENDAN-DEFENDAN

______________________________________________________

KUALA LUMPUR, March 6 — A former director of a computer software company today filed a suit against Magistrate Zaki Asyraf Zubir, Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail and seven others for false imprisonment concerning the charge of possession of 106 pornographic video clips in 2011. Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 42, filed the suit through Messr A S Dhaliwal at the High Court’s Registrar Office here, and named three deputy public prosecutor Norina Zainol Abidin, Mazelan Jamaluddin and Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli as defendants.

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ex-director-sues-a-g-magistrate-and-seven-more-for-false-imprisonment

… Kuala Lumpur: Seorang bekas pengarah syarikat perisian komputer memfailkan saman terhadap seorang majistret dan lapan yang lain termasuk Peguam Negara dan Kerajaan Malaysia terhadap dakwaan memenjarakannya secara salah bagi tuduhan memiliki 106 klip video lucah, lima tahun lalu. Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 42, selaku plaintif memfailkan saman itu di Pejabat Pendaftar Mahkamah Tinggi, di sini, semalam menerusi firma guaman Tetuan AS Dhaliwal. Plaintif menamakan Timbalan Pendakwa Raya di Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Pulau Pinang Norina Zainol Abidin, pegawai polis Inspektor Siti Mazira Zakaria dan Inspektor Mohd Razif Zahid, Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Mazelan Jamaluddin serta Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli sebagai defendan pertama hingga kelima. Mohamad Izaham turut menamakan Pembantu Undang-undang di Jabatan Peguam Negara Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Nur Wahida Md Khairuddin, Peguam Negara Tan Sri Abdul Ghani Patail, Majistret Mahkamah Majistret Jenayah 2 Kuala Lumpur Zaki Asyraf Zubir dan Kerajaan Malaysia selaku defendan keenam hingga kesembilan.

http://www.hmetro.com.my/myMetro/articles/Lelakisamanmajistret/Article/index_html

21.       Seksyen 43 Akta Penapisan Filem 2002 memperuntukkan seperti berikut:

Prosecution

“43.     Tiada pendakwaan berkenaan dengan apa-apa kesalahan d bawah Akta ini atau mana-mana peraturan yang dibuat di bawah Akta ini boleh dimulakan kecuali oleh atau dengan keizinan bertulis Pendakwa Raya.”

 22.       Sepanjang prosiding perbicaraan di hadapan Majistret, Mahkamah Majistret Jenayah 2, Kuala Lumpur, pihak pendakwaan tidak mengemukakan izin pendakwaan secara bertulis dan ini adalah bercanggah dengan peruntukkan Seksyen 43 Akta Penapisan Filem 2002. Ini dibuktikan dengan senarai ekshibit Jilid 2 Rekod Rayuan-izin pendakwaan tidak dikemukakan kepada Mahkamah dan ditanda sebagai ekshibit.

23.       Walaubagaimanapun setelah menerima Rekod Rayuan pada 5.5.2011, pihak Perayu mendapati bahawa salinan izin pendakwaan telah dimasukkan ke dalam Lampiran Dokumen (mukasurat 115 Rekod Rayuan Jilid 1) dan ini merupakan kali pertama pihak Perayu melihat salinan izin pendakwaan tersebut.

24.       Terdapat kecacatan material pada izin pendakwaan tersebut di mana izin pendakwaan diberi oleh seorang timbalan pendakwaraya yang bernama Mazelan Jamaludin tetapi ditandatangani oleh seorang timbalan pendakwaraya bernama Nor Aizam.

25.       Adalah menjadi hujahan Perayu bahawa izin pendakwaan mengikut peruntukkan Seksyen 43 Akta Penapisan Filem 2002 adalah mandatori dan ketinggalan untuk mengemukakannya menjadikan prosiding perbicaraan Kes Tangkap Tersebut satu (dengan izin) ‘nullity’.

26.       Pihak Perayu merujuk kepada kes Abdul Hamid v PP [1956] MLJ 231 (di mukasurat 3 Ikatan Otoriti Pihak Perayu) Smith J membuat pemerhatian seperti berikut:

“There is an essential difference to my mind between a sanction and a consent. A prosecution can be sanctioned without any deep consideration of the particular case : full consideration is required for consent since “consent” is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing, as in a balance, the good and evil on each side (Stround 3rd Ediiton vol 1 page 582). The sanction was therefore no evidence of consent.”

 27.      Pihak Perayu turut bersandarkan kepada kes Public Prosecutor v Lee Chwee Kiok [1979] 1 MLJ 45 (di mukasurat 2 Ikatan Otoriti Pihak Perayu) di mana mahkamah telah memutuskan bahawa prosiding adalah terbatal apabila tiada kebenaran untuk pertuduhan yang dipinda :

“The question is whether the court has jurisdiction to proceed with the trial on the amended charge without a fresh consent by the Public Prosecutor. As the matter is res integra I proceeded with the trial to save the public expense, the witnesses and jury being present in court. It will be observed that although the original and amended charges are two distinct offences, they are both created by the same section of the law viz. section 39B(1) and both carry the same penalty. Both require the consent of the Public Prosecutor under section 39B(3). The learned Deputy Public Prosecutor argued that the amendment was technical and as the Public Prosecutor had given his consent on the original charge he was at liberty to amend the charges in the manner he did. I do not think so. It was held in Abdul Hamid v Public Prosecutor [1956] MLJ 231 that a consent to prosecute “is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing, as in a balance, the good and evil on each side”. The Public Prosecutor has clearly exercised his mind in respect of the original charge when he gave his consent to prosecute some four months after the alleged offence. It was incumbent on him however to exercise the same degree of deliberation in respect of the amended charge. He has not done so. In Lim Seo v Regina [1962] MLJ 304 counsel was given sanction to prosecute undersection 379 of the Penal Code but he proceeded under section 381 of the Penal Code instead. It was held that counsel cannot depart from the specific authorisation of the Public Prosecutor. It seems to me that the same principles apply here. The facts of the case were fully before the Public Prosecutor at the time of giving his consent and he could have elected to proceed on the amended charge then. He did not do so. It would appear therefore that the Public Prosecutor has not given his consent to prosecute under the amended charge. That being so, the trial is a nullity on the authority of Lyn Hong Yap v Public Prosecutor [1956] MLJ 226.”

https://anticyberforensics.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/my-written-submission-for-the-reversal-of-malicious-prosecution-and-recalcitrant-of-magistrate-malice-defeats-immunity-judicial-immunity-2/

ab·sence

[ab-suhns]

noun
1.
state of being away or not being present: I acted as supervisor in his absence. Your absence was noted on the records.
2.
period of being away: an absence of several weeks.
3.
failure to attend or appear when expected.
4.
lack; deficiency: the absence of proof.
5.
inattentiveness; preoccupation; absent-mindedness: absence of mind.
Origin: 1350–1400; Middle English  < Middle French  < Latin absentia. See absent, -ia

Antonyms 1.  presence. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/absence ab·sence  (bsns)

n.
1. The state of being away.
2. The time during which one is away.
3. Lack; want: an absence of leadership.
4. The state of being absent-minded; inattentiveness: absence of mind.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


absence [ˈæbsəns]

n

1. the state of being away
2. the time during which a person or thing is away

3.the fact of being without something; lack

[via Old French from Latin absentia, from absēns a being away]

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/absence Nothing is no thing,[1] denoting the absence of something. Nothing is a pronoun associated with nothingness,[1], is also an adjective, and an object as a concept in the Frege-Church ontology. In nontechnical uses, nothing denotes things lacking importance, interest, value, relevance, or significance.[1] Nothingness is the state of being nothing,[2] the state of nonexistence of anything, or the property of having nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-generalized-hypothetical-analysis-the-ontology-of-eternity-and-nihilism/

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/chicken-and-egg-the-anthropic-cosmologically-causality-dilemma/

The Philosophy of Null Set Theory (Empty Set {}): The Cardinality of Being the Nothingness

Edit LinkSeptember 29, 2009 in Generalized Set Theory, The Anthropic Cosmological Principles Tags: The Philosophy of Set Theory

The Mathematical Theory of Nothing
“The Universe, which, so elegant and self-contained fashionably explained in higher dimensions of mathematically topological spaces, is the creations out of nothingness. Indeed, the explanation demands, such diversification of “nothingness” in creativity. Whereas, the diversification of “nothingness” itself is creativity of God, is basically the fundamental of all forces and matters.” – Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Die mathematische Theorie von nichts
“das Universum, das, also elegant und selbständiges fashionably erklärt in den höheren Maßen der mathematisch topologischen Räume,  die Kreationen aus Nichtse heraus ist. In der Tat verlangt die Erklärung, solche Diversifikation “des Nichtses” in der Kreativität. Während,  die Diversifikation “des Nichtses” selbst Kreativität des Gottes ist, im Allgemeinen ist die Grundlage aller Kräfte und Angelegenheiten.”  – Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, Vereinigtes Königreich.
La théorie mathématique de rien
“l’univers, qui, si élégant et d’un seul bloc fashionably expliqué dans des dimensions plus élevées des espaces mathématiquement topologiques,  est les créations hors de néant. En effet, l’explication exige, une telle diversification d’”néant” dans la créativité. Considérant que,  la diversification du “néant” elle-même est créativité de Dieu, est fondamentalement le principe fondamental de tous les forces et sujets.”  – Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni De.

*******************************************************************************************************

Abstract

The mathematical theory of nothing is the theory about nihilism, which the verdicts of quantum theory, general relativity theory and grand unified field theory have concluded that the universe as Non-Existence of the universe itself. The Universe, which, so elegant and self-contained fashionably explained in higher dimensions of mathematically topological spaces, is the creations out of nothingness. Indeed, the explanation demands, such diversification of “nothingness” in creativity. Whereas, the diversification of “nothingness” itself is creativity of God, is basically the fundamental of all forces and matters. For thousands of years, philosophers have tried to clarify, “Creator” and “Creations”, just like ancient cosmological argument about “Chicken and Egg”. The philosophies of eternity and the philosophies of nothingness rebut about the mathematical concept of energy and its equilibrium in the First Law of Thermodynamics. The law, which states that, “Energy can neither be created nor destroyed” is absolutely twaddling. The concept of the energy equilibrium is the logic that defines energy as eternal, no beginning and no end. Metaphysically and ontologically speaking, the conceptual logic of Eternity and the conceptual logic of Nihilism (Creations), will always contradict each other, as mathematicians and scientists used the the concepts of both logic vice versa. Likely, the hypothetical analysis, that all sciences are either “Cosmology” or “Kama Sutra”. Cosmological mind or cosmological forces and matters that either will be used to define the structure of our universe, when scientists started to gain entertainment upon such vague, yet substantial evidence of the “Non-Existence of Beings” (The Universe) against “The Absolute Existence of Being” (The Creator). Most of them suffer from a form of amnesia. Thus, the mathematical logic of Eternity and the mathematical logic of Nihilism can be distinguished between. Meanwhile, the concept of energy equilibrium, which used before, will be replaced from conceptual “zero” as the point of equilibrium into an “Empty Set” as new “Absolute Point of Equilibrium” with respect to “The Absolute Static Point of Equilibrium of Universe”.

Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, and special words of thanks to Mick Mattis (of St. Leonards on Sea, Hastings, United Kingdom) for proof reading this Abstract and the whole thesis, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom. Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

Al-Quran Karim:

cancelledout

From My Doctorate Thesis:

For a statement P(x) that is false for every possible value of x, nothing within the universe can pass the elementhood test for the truth set of P(x), and so, therefore, this truth set must have no elements.

emptyset

Since the truth set of P(x) has no element, this result of

emptyelement

statement, which is always false.

Therefore,

Theorem 1:

Any theory T generated from this statement including basic arithmetical nihilism and  T will always contradict to almost all Physics Laws and Cosmological Principles.

(Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim , First Published January, 1992) Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

(Proof of this mathematical theorem will not be shown in this blog).

This Theorem is dedicated To:

M.J. Giles, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Engineering, Science and Technology, Ellison Building, The University of Northumbria, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK *******************************************************************************************************

Theorem 2:

“Time present and time past The end precedes the beginning And the beginning were always there Before the beginning and after the end And All is always now”.

(“Time”, By Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, First Published September 6, 1991) Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom. *******************************************************************************************************

Theorem 3:

Nothingness manifests itself into the diversification of elements (how to substantiate),

Substance (Essence) reveals itself into the origination of spaces (how to materialize),

Matter corroborates itself into the emanation of time (how to curve),

Curvature oscillates itself unto the emergence of energy (how to equalibrize),

Equilibrium annihilates itself onto the Nullity of Universe (how to vanish {into Nothingness}).

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom. *******************************************************************************************************

Theorem 13:

“[N]othingness is the highest dimension of mathematically topological spaces.”

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom. *******************************************************************************************************

Abstrakte

Die mathematische Theorie von nichts ist die Theorie über nihilism, dem die Urteilssprüche der Quantentheorie, der allgemeinen Relativität Theorie und der großartigen vereinheitlichten Feldtheorie daß das Universum als Nicht-Bestehen des Universums selbst festgestellt haben. Das Universum, das, also elegant und selbständiges fashionably erklärt in den höheren Maßen der mathematisch topologischen Räume, die Kreationen aus Nichtse heraus ist. In der Tat verlangt die Erklärung, solche Diversifikation “des Nichtses” in der Kreativität. Während, die Diversifikation “des Nichtses” selbst Kreativität des Gottes ist, im Allgemeinen ist die Grundlage aller Kräfte und Angelegenheiten. Für Tausenden Jahre, haben Philosophen versucht, zu erklären, “Schöpfer” und “Kreationen”, gerade wie altes kosmologisches Argument über “Huhn und Ei”. Die Philosophien der Ewigkeit und die Philosophien des Nichtses widerlegen über das mathematische Konzept von Energie und von seinem Gleichgewicht im ersten Gesetz von Thermodynamik. Das Gesetz, das das angibt, “Energie machen weder wird verursacht ein, noch zerstört” twaddling absolut. Das Konzept des Energiegleichgewichts ist die Logik, die Energie definiert, wie ewig, kein Anfang und kein Ende. Metaphysisch und ontologically der Ewigkeit sprechen, die Begriffs-Logik und die Begriffs-Logik von Nihilism (Kreationen), widersprechen sich immer, wie Mathematiker und Wissenschaftler die Konzepte von beiden Logik umgekehrt verwendeten. Wahrscheinlich die hypothetische Analyse, daß alle Wissenschaften entweder “Kosmologie” oder “Kama Sutra” sind. Kosmologischer Verstand oder kosmologische Kräfte und Angelegenheiten, daß irgendein verwendet wird, um die Struktur unseres Universums zu definieren, als Wissenschaftler begannen, Unterhaltung nach solchem vagem zu gewinnen, dennoch überzeugender Beweis des “Nicht-Bestehens der Wesen” (das Universum) gegen “das absolute Bestehen des Seins” (der Schöpfer). Die meisten ihnen leiden unter einer Form von Amnesia. So können die formale Logik der Ewigkeit und die formale Logik von Nihilism bemerkenswert zwischen sein. Unterdessen wird das Konzept des Energiegleichgewichts, dem vor verwendete, von Begriffs”null” als der Punkt des Gleichgewichts in “leeren Satz” als neuer “absoluter Punkt des Gleichgewichts” in Bezug auf “den absoluten statischen Punkt des Gleichgewichts des Universums” ersetzt.

Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim und spezielle Wörter des Dankes Mick Mattis (von Str. Leonards auf Meer, Hastings, Vereinigtes Königreich) für Beweismesswert dieses abstrakte und die vollständige These, September 2002,  Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 9EW Vereinigtes Königreich.

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/the-philosophy-of-empty-set-cardinality-of-being-nothingness/

Nihili Algebra {}-Generated By Distributive Lattices in Null Set Theory (Hybridized Null Set Theory with Fuzzy Set Theory on The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Neural-Null-Fuzzy Systems)

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/nihili-algebra-generated-by-distributive-lattices-in-null-set-theory/ The Prime Number for this case are 13 and 7. Basic List of Prime Numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293, 307, 311, 313, 317, 331, 337, 347, 349, 353, 359, 367, 373, 379, 383, 389, 397, 401, 409, 419, 421, 431, 433, 439, 443, 449, 457, 461, 463, 467, 479, 487, 491, 499, 503, 509, 521, 523, 541, 547, 557, 563, 569, 571, 577, 587, 593, 599, 601, 607, 613, 617, 619, 631, 641, 643, 647, 653, 659, 661, 673, 677, 683, 691, 701, 709, 719, 727, 733, 739, 743, 751, 757, 761, 769, 773, 787, 797, 809, 811, 821, 823, 827, 829, 839, 853, 857, 859, 863, 877, 881, 883, 887, 907, 911, 919, 929, 937, 941, 947, 953, 967, 971, 977, 983, 991, 997, …

688px-Goldbach_partitions_of_the_even_integers_from_4_to_50_rev4b.svg

Goldbach’s Conjecture On Prime Numbers

The Spiral of Archimedes

God Encrypted The Secret of The Victory within “generalia specialibus non derogant” of 7, 13 and 43 (vs. “self-defeating” 107) where those are the Prime Numbers for this civil suit 2014: So I Decrypted It

22. Bagi menjawab perenggan 29 dan 30 Pembelaan, Plaintif mengulangi perenggan 28 dan 29 Pernyataan Tuntutan dan Plaintif menafikan pernyataan-pernyataan di perenggan 29 dan 30 Pembelaan dan Defendan-Defendan dikehendaki membuktikannya dengan kukuh. Plaintif turut memplidkan prinsip undang-undang dalam maxim undang-undang “generalia specialibus non derogant” dan terpakai di mana seksyen 43 Akta Penapisan Filem 2002 sebagai undang-undang yang spesifik mengatasi seksyen 107 Akta Mahkamah Rendah 1948 dan seksyen 5 dan 6 Akta Prosiding Kerajaan 1965.

***** Lord Denning was a mathematician before he turned up to be Master of the Rolls

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning *****

List of Fibonacci numbers

The first 21 Fibonacci numbers Fn for n = 0, 1, 2, …, 20 are:

F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F15 F16 F17 F18 F19 F20
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765

The sequence can also be extended to negative index n using the re-arranged recurrence relation

F_{n-2} = F_n - F_{n-1}, \,

which yields the sequence of “negafibonacci” numbers satisfying

F_{-n} = (-1)^{n+1} F_n. \,

Thus the complete sequence is

F−8 F−7 F−6 F−5 F−4 F−3 F−2 F−1 F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
−21 13 −8 5 −3 2 −1 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21

*****

The Spiral of Archimedes

circleA Circle

piPi on Combinatorics and Permutation of Sets of Elements and the Relations with Very Huge Gigantic Blocks of Prime Numbers at the decimal number from its fractional part of (Circumference/Diameter) Ratio

http://www.piday.org/million/

http://www.exploratorium.edu/pi/pi_archive/Pi10-6.html

Orbital Period 3 Bifurcation Diagram of Logistic Map – “Period 3 Implies Chaos”

+++++++

Contempt without Jurisdiction – This would be a recipe for chaos

M. v. HOME OFFICE AND ANOTHER 1991 Nov. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15; 29 Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R., McCowan and Nolan L.JJ.

An order which is made by a court with unlimited jurisdiction is binding unless and until it is set aside. Common sense suggests that this must be so. Were it otherwise court orders would be consistently ignored in the belief, sometimes justified, that at some time in the future they would be set aside. This would be a recipe for chaos. If authority be required, it is provided by the opinion of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council delivered by Lord Diplock in Isaacs v. Robertson [1985] A.C. 97, 102-103:

Fibonacci Numbers

F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F15 F16 F17 F18 F19 F20
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765

The sequence can also be extended to negative index n using the re-arranged recurrence relation

F_{n-2} = F_n - F_{n-1}, \,

which yields the sequence of “negafibonacci” numbers satisfying

F_{-n} = (-1)^{n+1} F_n. \,

Thus the complete sequence is

F−8 F−7 F−6 F−5 F−4 F−3 F−2 F−1 F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
−21 13 −8 5 −3 2 −1 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21

The Spiral of Fibonacci

*** “Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.” Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872) A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts. Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938) Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974) When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction. State use of Little v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697. “… the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803). ** “The doctrine of judicial immunity originated in early seventeenth-century England in the jurisprudence of Sir Edward Coke. In two decisions, Floyd & Barker and the Case of the Marshalsea, Lord Coke laid the foundation for the doctrine of judicial immunity.” Floyd & Barker, 77 Eng. Rep. 1305 (1607; The Case of the Marshalsea, 77 Eng. Rep. 1027 (1612) were both cases right out of the Star Chamber. Coke’s reasoning for judicial immunity was presented in four public policy grounds: 1. Finality of judgment; 2. Maintenance of judicial independence; 3. Freedom from continual calumniations; and, 4. Respect and confidence in the judiciary. The Marshalsea presents a case where Coke denied a judge immunity for presiding over a case in assumpsit. Assumpsit is a common-law action for recovery of damages for breach of contract. Coke then explained the operation of jurisdiction requirement for immunity: . “[W]hen a Court has (a) jurisdiction of the cause, and proceeds iverso ordine or erroneously, there the party who sues, or the officer or minister of the Court who executes the precept or process of the Court, no action lies against them. But (b) when the Court has not jurisdiction of the cause, there the whole proceeding is [before a person who is not a judge], and actions will lie against them without any regard of the precept or process…” Although narrowing the availability of judicial immunity, especially in courts of limited jurisdiction, Coke suggested that there was a presumption of jurisdiction and that the judge must have been aware that jurisdiction was lacking. Thus, questions of personam, rem and res jurisdiction are always a proper issue before the court to obviate the defense that the court had no way to know they lacked jurisdiction. ** SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION If a judge acts without subject-matter jurisdiction, the judge is acting unlawfully, he/she has committed an unlawful interference with one’s person, property, or rights. Is the judge who acts without subject-matter jurisdiction then anything but a common criminal? And all orders and judgments issued by a judge who acts without subject-matter jurisdiction are, as a matter of law, void. http://www.clr.org/smj.html

RAIN

Listen to the pouring rain Listen to it pour, And with every drop of rain You know I love you more

Let it rain all night long, Let my love for you go strong, As long as we’re together Who cares about the weather?

Listen to the falling rain, Listen to it fall, And with every drop of rain, I can hear you call, Call my name right out loud, I can here above the clouds And I’m here among the puddles, You and I together huddle.

Listen to the falling rain, Listen to it fall.

It’s raining, It’s pouring, The old man is snoring, Went to bed And bumped his head, He couldn’t get up in the morning,

Listen to the falling rain, Listen to the rain.

Che sarà

Paese mio che stai sulla collina, disteso come un vecchio addormentato la noia, l’abbandono, il niente son la tua malattia, paese mio ti lascio io vado via.

Che sarà, che sarà, che sarà. Che sarà della mia vita chi lo sa. So far tutto o forse niente, da domani si vedrà, e sarà, sarà quel che sarà.

Gli amici miei son quasi tutti via

e gli altri partiranno dopo me. Peccato perché stavo bene in loro compagnia, ma tutto passa, tutto se ne và.

Che sarà, che sarà, che sarà. Con me porto la chitarra e se la notte piangerò, una nenia di paese suonerò.

Amore mio ti bacio sulla bocca che fu la fonte del mio primo amor, ti do L’appuntamento dove e quando non lo so, ma so soltanto che ritornerò.

Che sarà, che sarà……

“Incomplete”

Empty spaces fill me up with holes Distant faces with no place left to go Without you within me, I can find no rest Where I’m goin’ is anybody’s guess

I tried to go on like I never knew you I’m awake but my world is half asleep I pray for this heart to be unbroken But without you, all I’m going to be is incomplete

Voices tell me I should carry on But I am swimming in an ocean all alone Baby, my baby, it’s written on your face You still wonder if we made a big mistake

I tried to go on like I never knew you I’m awake but my world is half asleep I pray for this heart to be unbroken But without you, all I’m going to be is incomplete

I don’t mean to drag it on But I can’t seem to let you go I don’t want to make you face this world alone I want to let you go (Alone)

I tried to go on like I never knew you I’m awake but my world is half asleep I pray for this heart to be unbroken But without you, all I’m going to be is incomplete Incomplete

FlightSim005

FlightSim003

FlightSim002

FlightSim010

FlightSim011

FlightSim013

FlightSim014

FlightSim016

FlightSim017

FlightSim019

FlightSim023

FlightSim022

FlightSim024

FlightSim025

FlightSim021

FlightSim026

FlightSim027

FlightSim028

FlightSim028

FlightSim029

FlightSim030

FlightSim031

FlightSim032

FlightSim034

KUALA LUMPUR, March 6 — A former director of a computer software company today filed a suit against Magistrate Zaki Asyraf Zubir, Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail and seven others for false imprisonment concerning the charge of possession of 106 pornographic video clips in 2011.

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 42, filed the suit through Messr A S Dhaliwal at the High Court’s Registrar Office here, and named three deputy public prosecutor Norina Zainol Abidin, Mazelan Jamaluddin and Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli as defendants. – See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ex-director-sues-a-g-magistrate-and-seven-more-for-false-imprisonment#sthash.myi8a42E.dpuf

Categories: Absence of Jurisdiction, Art of Counter-CyberForensics, Bifurcation Theory, Blog, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem Codes, Breach of Expert Duties, Breach of Natural Justice, Breach of Prosecution's Duties, Brute-Force Attack, Case Law Studies, Chain of Custody, Chain of Evidence, Chaos Theory, Code Breakers, Conspiracy Theory, Control, Credibility of Expert Witness, Criminal & Civil Liability of Expert Witness, Criminal Behavioral Studies, Criminal Justice, Criminal Procedures Code (Act 593) - Malayan Law, Criminology, Cryptanalysis, Cryptography, Custody, Cyber Forensics & Investigations, Damages, Data Analyses, Definition of Possession in Law, Domain Names, E-mail, Electronic Evidence, Error-Correcting Codes, Evidence Act 1950 (Malayan Law), Evidence Not Marked As Exhibit, Expert At Crime Scene, Expert Evidence, Expert Witness, Failure of Gaussian Hypothesis, Federal Constitutions, Fibonacci Numbers, First Information Report (FIR), Fluid Dynamics, Forensics Standards, FOREX THEORY, Fractal Market Analysis, Fractal Market Hypothesis, Fractal Time Series, Freedom and Privacy, Freedom of Thought, Fundamental Human Rights, Fuzzy Sets, Game Theory, Gaussian and Non-Gaussian, Gazetted Expert Witness, Geological Forensics Science, Human Rights, Illegally Obtained Evidence, Information, Intellectual Properties & Copyrights, Invasion of Privacy, Jurisdictions of Syariah Courts, Knowledge, Laminar Flow, Law of Tort, Limitation of Immunity of Judge in Lower Court, Limitations to The Immunity Rule, Lyapunov Exponent, Malicious Prosecution, Manner in which lack of competency may rise, Marriage & Privacy, Marriage Rights, Mathematical Chess Strategies, Mathematical Theory of Nothing, MD5, Measures of Central Tendency, Measures of Determinism, Measures of Dispersion, Measures of Fuzziness, Measures of Nothingness, Measures of Stochasticity, Meteorological Sciences and Analyses, My Young Padawans on The Moves, Natural Justice, Networking and Internet, Neural Fuzzy, Noisy Chaos vs R/S Analysis, Null Set Theory, Number Theory, One-Way Hash Functions, Padawan, Penal Codes, Perturbation Theory, Power and Privacy, Private Property, Private Spaces, Prosecution, Qualitative Analysis, Quantitative Analysis, Reed-Solomon Codes, Retrospective of Privacy, S 120 Parties to Civil Suits and Wives and Husbands, S1 Evidence Act 1950, S10 Evidence Act 1950, S11 Evidence Act 1950, S12 Evidence Act 1950, S122 Evidence Act (Communication During Marriage), S13 Evidence Act 1950, S14 Evidence Act 1950, S15 Evidence Act 1950, S16 Evidence Act 1950, S17 Evidence Act 1950, S2 Evidence Act 1950, S3 Evidence Act 1950, S4 Evidence Act 1950, S44 Fraud or Collusion in Obtaining Judgement or Incompetency of Court May Be Rise, S45 Evidence Act 1950, S5 Evidence Act 1950, S56 Fact Judicially Noticeable Need To Be Proved, S57 Facts of Which Court Must Take Judicial Notice, S6 Evidence Act 1950, S65 Evidence Act 1950, S65(1)(c) Evidence Act 1950, S7 Evidence Act 1950, S8 Evidence Act 1950, S9 Evidence Act 1950, S93 Exclusion of Evidence To Explain or Amend Ambigious Document, Scientific Evidence and Law, Secret of The Bodies, Secure Communications, Self-Perturbation, Self-Perturbed Prime Numbers, SHA-1, Solar and Lunar Calculations, Territories of Selfness, The Algorithms, The Daubert Test, The Dyas Test, The Frye Test, The Hurst Processes, The Jacobetz Refinement, The Kelly-Frye Test, The Kumho Gloss, The Non-linear Algorithms, The Post-Daubert Decisions, The Source Codes, The Spiral of Archimedes, The Spiral of Fibonacci, The Theory of Pure Democracy, The Williams Departure, Trial Within Trial, True Definition of Natural Justice, Turbulence, Vicarious Liability, Websites, Without Search Warrant
  1. samsung s5
    July 14, 2014 at 9:57 pm

    Very good blog you have here but I was curious about if you understood of any discussion boards that cover
    the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really like to be a part of
    group whenever I can get suggestions from other knowledgeable people that
    communicate the same interest. If you have any recommendations, feel free to make me
    aware. Thanks a lot!

  1. June 13, 2014 at 10:34 am
    clash of clans game on pc
  2. December 31, 2014 at 11:06 pm
    serrure
  3. March 5, 2015 at 7:41 am
    http://www.friendlybuilders.co.uk/Glazing/Windows-Forest-Gate.html
  4. June 10, 2015 at 11:33 pm
    just click the following document
  5. June 28, 2015 at 2:38 am
    www.youtube.com
  6. July 16, 2015 at 7:12 pm
    local company Waterville
  7. July 19, 2015 at 7:49 pm
    friendly builders Letterkenny
  8. August 1, 2015 at 12:47 pm
    how to earn gold bars in alphabetty saga
  9. August 31, 2015 at 7:55 pm
    bespoke conservatories in Latheronwheel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: