Home > Art of Counter-CyberForensics, Case Law Studies, Scientific Evidence and Law > The Mathematical Theory of Nothing: Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim

The Mathematical Theory of Nothing: Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim

ab·sence

[ab-suhns]

noun

1.

state of being away or not being present: I acted as supervisor in his absence. Your absence was noted on the records.
2.

period of being away: an absence of several weeks.
3.

failure to attend or appear when expected.
4.

lack; deficiency: the absence of proof.
5.

inattentiveness; preoccupation; absent-mindedness: absence of mind.
Origin:
1350–1400; Middle English  < Middle French  < Latin absentia. See absent, -ia

Antonyms
1.  presence.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/absence

ab·sence  (bsns)

n.

1. The state of being away.
2. The time during which one is away.
3. Lack; want: an absence of leadership.
4. The state of being absent-minded; inattentiveness: absence of mind.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


absence [ˈæbsəns]

n

1. the state of being away
2. the time during which a person or thing is away
3.the fact of being without something; lack

[via Old French from Latin absentia, from absēns a being away]

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/absence

Nothing is no thing,[1] denoting the absence of something. Nothing is a pronoun associated with nothingness,[1], is also an adjective, and an object as a concept in the Frege-Church ontology.

In nontechnical uses, nothing denotes things lacking importance, interest, value, relevance, or significance.[1] Nothingness is the state of being nothing,[2] the state of nonexistence of anything, or the property of having nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/the-generalized-hypothetical-analysis-the-ontology-of-eternity-and-nihilism/

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/chicken-and-egg-the-anthropic-cosmologically-causality-dilemma/

The Philosophy of Null Set Theory (Empty Set {}): The Cardinality of Being the Nothingness

Edit LinkSeptember 29, 2009 in Generalized Set Theory, The Anthropic Cosmological Principles
Tags: The Philosophy of Set Theory

The Mathematical Theory of Nothing

“The Universe, which, so elegant and self-contained fashionably explained in higher dimensions of mathematically topological spaces, is the creations out of nothingness. Indeed, the explanation demands, such diversification of “nothingness” in creativity. Whereas, the diversification of “nothingness” itself is creativity of God, is basically the fundamental of all forces and matters.” – Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Die mathematische Theorie von nichts

“das Universum, das, also elegant und selbständiges fashionably erklärt in den höheren Maßen der mathematisch topologischen Räume,  die Kreationen aus Nichtse heraus ist. In der Tat verlangt die Erklärung, solche Diversifikation “des Nichtses” in der Kreativität. Während,  die Diversifikation “des Nichtses” selbst Kreativität des Gottes ist, im Allgemeinen ist die Grundlage aller Kräfte und Angelegenheiten.”  – Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, Vereinigtes Königreich.

La théorie mathématique de rien

“l’univers, qui, si élégant et d’un seul bloc fashionably expliqué dans des dimensions plus élevées des espaces mathématiquement topologiques,  est les créations hors de néant. En effet, l’explication exige, une telle diversification d’”néant” dans la créativité. Considérant que,  la diversification du “néant” elle-même est créativité de Dieu, est fondamentalement le principe fondamental de tous les forces et sujets.”  – Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim, 2002, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni De.

*******************************************************************************************************

Abstract

The mathematical theory of nothing is the theory about nihilism, which the verdicts of quantum theory, general relativity theory and grand unified field theory have concluded that the universe as Non-Existence of the universe itself. The Universe, which, so elegant and self-contained fashionably explained in higher dimensions of mathematically topological spaces, is the creations out of nothingness. Indeed, the explanation demands, such diversification of “nothingness” in creativity. Whereas, the diversification of “nothingness” itself is creativity of God, is basically the fundamental of all forces and matters. For thousands of years, philosophers have tried to clarify, “Creator” and “Creations”, just like ancient cosmological argument about “Chicken and Egg”. The philosophies of eternity and the philosophies of nothingness rebut about the mathematical concept of energy and its equilibrium in the First Law of Thermodynamics. The law, which states that, “Energy can neither be created nor destroyed” is absolutely twaddling. The concept of the energy equilibrium is the logic that defines energy as eternal, no beginning and no end. Metaphysically and ontologically speaking, the conceptual logic of Eternity and the conceptual logic of Nihilism (Creations), will always contradict each other, as mathematicians and scientists used the the concepts of both logic vice versa. Likely, the hypothetical analysis, that all sciences are either “Cosmology” or “Kama Sutra”. Cosmological mind or cosmological forces and matters that either will be used to define the structure of our universe, when scientists started to gain entertainment upon such vague, yet substantial evidence of the “Non-Existence of Beings” (The Universe) against “The Absolute Existence of Being” (The Creator). Most of them suffer from a form of amnesia. Thus, the mathematical logic of Eternity and the mathematical logic of Nihilism can be distinguished between. Meanwhile, the concept of energy equilibrium, which used before, will be replaced from conceptual “zero” as the point of equilibrium into an “Empty Set” as new “Absolute Point of Equilibrium” with respect to “The Absolute Static Point of Equilibrium of Universe”.

Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, and special words of thanks to Mick Mattis (of St. Leonards on Sea, Hastings, United Kingdom) for proof reading this Abstract and the whole thesis, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

Al-Quran Karim

cancelledout

From My Thesis:

For a statement P(x) that is false for every possible value of x, nothing within the universe can pass the elementhood test for the truth set of P(x), and so, therefore, this truth set must have no elements.

emptyset

Since the truth set of P(x) has no element, this result of

emptyelement

statement, which is always false.

Therefore,

Theorem 1:

Any theory T generated from this statement including basic arithmetical nihilism and  T will always contradict to almost all Physics Laws and Cosmological Principles.

(Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim , First Published January, 1992)

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

(Proof of this mathematical theorem will not be shown in this blog).

This Theorem is dedicated To:

M.J. Giles, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Engineering, Science and Technology, Ellison Building, The University of Northumbria, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK

*******************************************************************************************************

Theorem 2:

“Time present and time past

The end precedes the beginning

And the beginning were always there

Before the beginning and after the end

And All is always now”.

(“Time”, By Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim, First Published September 6, 1991)

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

*******************************************************************************************************

Theorem 13:

“[N]othingness is the highest dimension of mathematically topological spaces.”

Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, “The Mathematical Theory of Nothing”, September 2002, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom.

*******************************************************************************************************

Abstrakte

Die mathematische Theorie von nichts ist die Theorie über nihilism, dem die Urteilssprüche der Quantentheorie, der allgemeinen Relativität Theorie und der großartigen vereinheitlichten Feldtheorie daß das Universum als Nicht-Bestehen des Universums selbst festgestellt haben. Das Universum, das, also elegant und selbständiges fashionably erklärt in den höheren Maßen der mathematisch topologischen Räume, die Kreationen aus Nichtse heraus ist. In der Tat verlangt die Erklärung, solche Diversifikation “des Nichtses” in der Kreativität. Während, die Diversifikation “des Nichtses” selbst Kreativität des Gottes ist, im Allgemeinen ist die Grundlage aller Kräfte und Angelegenheiten. Für Tausenden Jahre, haben Philosophen versucht, zu erklären, “Schöpfer” und “Kreationen”, gerade wie altes kosmologisches Argument über “Huhn und Ei”. Die Philosophien der Ewigkeit und die Philosophien des Nichtses widerlegen über das mathematische Konzept von Energie und von seinem Gleichgewicht im ersten Gesetz von Thermodynamik. Das Gesetz, das das angibt, “Energie machen weder wird verursacht ein, noch zerstört” twaddling absolut. Das Konzept des Energiegleichgewichts ist die Logik, die Energie definiert, wie ewig, kein Anfang und kein Ende. Metaphysisch und ontologically der Ewigkeit sprechen, die Begriffs-Logik und die Begriffs-Logik von Nihilism (Kreationen), widersprechen sich immer, wie Mathematiker und Wissenschaftler die Konzepte von beiden Logik umgekehrt verwendeten. Wahrscheinlich die hypothetische Analyse, daß alle Wissenschaften entweder “Kosmologie” oder “Kama Sutra” sind. Kosmologischer Verstand oder kosmologische Kräfte und Angelegenheiten, daß irgendein verwendet wird, um die Struktur unseres Universums zu definieren, als Wissenschaftler begannen, Unterhaltung nach solchem vagem zu gewinnen, dennoch überzeugender Beweis des “Nicht-Bestehens der Wesen” (das Universum) gegen “das absolute Bestehen des Seins” (der Schöpfer). Die meisten ihnen leiden unter einer Form von Amnesia. So können die formale Logik der Ewigkeit und die formale Logik von Nihilism bemerkenswert zwischen sein. Unterdessen wird das Konzept des Energiegleichgewichts, dem vor verwendete, von Begriffs”null” als der Punkt des Gleichgewichts in “leeren Satz” als neuer “absoluter Punkt des Gleichgewichts” in Bezug auf “den absoluten statischen Punkt des Gleichgewichts des Universums” ersetzt.

Mohamad Izaham bin Mohamed Yatim und spezielle Wörter des Dankes Mick Mattis (von Str. Leonards auf Meer, Hastings, Vereinigtes Königreich) für Beweismesswert dieses abstrakte und die vollständige These, September 2002,  Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 9EW Vereinigtes Königreich.

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/the-philosophy-of-empty-set-cardinality-of-being-nothingness/

Nihili Algebra {}-Generated By Distributive Lattices in Null Set Theory (Hybridized Null Set Theory with Fuzzy Set Theory on The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Neural-Null-Fuzzy Systems)

http://themathematicaltheoryofnothing.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/nihili-algebra-generated-by-distributive-lattices-in-null-set-theory/

The Prime Number for this case are 13 and 7.

Basic Lists of Prime Numbers

2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293, 307, 311, 313, 317, 331, 337, 347, 349, 353, 359, 367, 373, 379, 383, 389, 397, 401, 409, 419, 421, 431, 433, 439, 443, 449, 457, 461, 463, 467, 479, 487, 491, 499, 503, 509, 521, 523, 541, 547, 557, 563, 569, 571, 577, 587, 593, 599, 601, 607, 613, 617, 619, 631, 641, 643, 647, 653, 659, 661, 673, 677, 683, 691, 701, 709, 719, 727, 733, 739, 743, 751, 757, 761, 769, 773, 787, 797, 809, 811, 821, 823, 827, 829, 839, 853, 857, 859, 863, 877, 881, 883, 887, 907, 911, 919, 929, 937, 941, 947, 953, 967, 971, 977, 983, 991, 997, …

*****

List of Fibonacci numbers

The first 21 Fibonacci numbers Fn for n = 0, 1, 2, …, 20 are:

F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F15 F16 F17 F18 F19 F20
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765

The sequence can also be extended to negative index n using the re-arranged recurrence relation

F_{n-2} = F_n - F_{n-1}, \,

which yields the sequence of “negafibonacci” numbers satisfying

F_{-n} = (-1)^{n+1} F_n. \,

Thus the complete sequence is

F−8 F−7 F−6 F−5 F−4 F−3 F−2 F−1 F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
−21 13 −8 5 −3 2 −1 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21

*****

“Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.” Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts. Davis v. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938)

Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A. Ariz. 1974)

When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction. State use of Little v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697.

“… the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803).

**

“The doctrine of judicial immunity originated in early seventeenth-century England in the jurisprudence of Sir Edward Coke. In two decisions, Floyd & Barker and the Case of the Marshalsea, Lord Coke laid the foundation for the doctrine of judicial immunity.” Floyd & Barker, 77 Eng. Rep. 1305 (1607; The Case of the Marshalsea, 77 Eng. Rep. 1027 (1612) were both cases right out of the Star Chamber.

Coke’s reasoning for judicial immunity was presented in four public policy grounds:
1. Finality of judgment;
2. Maintenance of judicial independence;
3. Freedom from continual calumniations; and,
4. Respect and confidence in the judiciary.

The Marshalsea presents a case where Coke denied a judge immunity for presiding over a case in assumpsit. Assumpsit is a common-law action for recovery of damages for breach of contract. Coke then explained the operation of jurisdiction requirement for immunity:

. “[W]hen a Court has (a) jurisdiction of the cause, and proceeds iverso ordine or erroneously, there the party who sues, or the officer or minister of the Court who executes the precept or process of the Court, no action lies against them. But (b) when the Court has not jurisdiction of the cause, there the whole proceeding is [before a person who is not a judge], and actions will lie against them without any regard of the precept or process…”

Although narrowing the availability of judicial immunity, especially in courts of limited jurisdiction, Coke suggested that there was a presumption of jurisdiction and that the judge must have been aware that jurisdiction was lacking.

Thus, questions of personam, rem and res jurisdiction are always a proper issue before the court to obviate the defense that the court had no way to know they lacked jurisdiction.

**

SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION

If a judge acts without subject-matter jurisdiction, the judge is acting unlawfully, he/she has committed an unlawful interference with one’s person, property, or rights.

Is the judge who acts without subject-matter jurisdiction then anything but a common criminal?

And all orders and judgments issued by a judge who acts without subject-matter jurisdiction are, as a matter of law, void.

http://www.clr.org/smj.html

  1. munkaruha webáruház
    March 27, 2015 at 8:16 am

    I got this website from my friend who shared with me on the
    topic of this site and now this time I am visiting this site and reading very informative articles or reviews at this time.

  2. technology news
    December 9, 2015 at 6:10 am

    Howdy! I just want to offer yyou a big thumbs up forr your
    excellent information you’ve got here on tthis post. I will be
    returning to your site for more soon.

  1. March 23, 2014 at 5:05 am
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWTOIadTEv4
  2. March 28, 2014 at 4:58 am
    ford kansas city
  3. March 31, 2014 at 9:07 pm
    web site optimization
  4. May 7, 2014 at 12:12 am
    taurus
  5. May 7, 2014 at 12:14 am
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Uh4qdSJ11Y
  6. May 7, 2014 at 2:13 am
    a forever recovery rehab facility
  7. May 7, 2014 at 3:23 am
    theclevergroup.com
  8. May 7, 2014 at 4:28 am
    seo
  9. May 7, 2014 at 4:48 am
    affordable search engine optimization
  10. May 7, 2014 at 8:59 am
    horse glucosamine
  11. May 7, 2014 at 12:33 pm
    christopher pruijsen
  12. May 7, 2014 at 12:57 pm
    web hosting sydney
  13. May 7, 2014 at 1:23 pm
    forever recovery alcoholism treatment
  14. May 7, 2014 at 1:38 pm
    posicionamiento web profesionales
  15. May 7, 2014 at 2:06 pm
    que es el seo
  16. May 7, 2014 at 4:57 pm
    que es el seo
  17. May 7, 2014 at 4:59 pm
    rehabilitation program
  18. May 7, 2014 at 5:10 pm
    flex
  19. May 7, 2014 at 5:42 pm
    http://charlotte.forddeal.net/
  20. May 7, 2014 at 6:28 pm
    seo services perth
  21. May 7, 2014 at 8:26 pm
    creator a forever recovery
  22. May 7, 2014 at 10:10 pm
    forever recovery
  23. May 7, 2014 at 11:20 pm
    california ford
  24. May 8, 2014 at 12:09 am
    posicionamiento seo
  25. May 8, 2014 at 4:36 am
    what can i give my dog for arthritis pain
  26. May 8, 2014 at 5:36 am
    service
  27. May 8, 2014 at 9:38 am
    detroit ford
  28. May 8, 2014 at 9:41 am
    forever recovery
  29. May 8, 2014 at 2:17 pm
    servicios de seo
  30. May 8, 2014 at 8:29 pm
    seo agency sydney
  31. May 8, 2014 at 8:59 pm
    que es el seo
  32. May 8, 2014 at 11:00 pm
    Goldline app
  33. May 9, 2014 at 1:58 am
    Rosland Capital advisors
  34. May 9, 2014 at 2:55 pm
    creator a forever recovery
  35. May 9, 2014 at 3:28 pm
    Merit Financial gold ira specialist
  36. May 9, 2014 at 5:13 pm
    alcoholism by forever recovery
  37. May 9, 2014 at 7:21 pm
    cheap life insurance for seniors
  38. May 9, 2014 at 11:27 pm
    http://about.me/learcapitalbbb
  39. May 10, 2014 at 7:10 am
    life insurance calculator
  40. May 10, 2014 at 11:18 am
    Regal Assets corp
  41. May 10, 2014 at 12:25 pm
    search engine optimization company
  42. May 10, 2014 at 2:18 pm
    a forever recovery methods
  43. May 10, 2014 at 3:49 pm
    search engine placement service
  44. May 10, 2014 at 6:30 pm
    choosing the right seo services for website
  45. May 10, 2014 at 9:20 pm
    christopher pruijsen
  46. May 11, 2014 at 1:53 am
    increase online visibility
  47. May 11, 2014 at 8:45 am
    que significa seo
  48. May 11, 2014 at 11:04 am
    free seo tools
  49. May 11, 2014 at 2:21 pm
    posicionamiento orgánico
  50. May 12, 2014 at 12:27 am
    seo practitioner
  51. May 12, 2014 at 2:14 am
    mortgage protection insurance
  52. May 12, 2014 at 6:15 am
    alcoholics
  53. May 12, 2014 at 6:38 am
    seo consultant
  54. May 12, 2014 at 8:47 am
    social media management
  55. May 12, 2014 at 8:47 pm
    www.4searchengineoptimization.com
  56. May 12, 2014 at 9:24 pm
    seo posicionamiento
  57. May 12, 2014 at 10:20 pm
    whole life vs term insurance
  58. May 13, 2014 at 1:11 am
    seo consultants perth
  59. May 13, 2014 at 3:55 am
    posicionamiento en buscadores
  60. May 13, 2014 at 1:52 pm
    seo consultants
  61. May 13, 2014 at 9:08 pm
    seo services
  62. May 13, 2014 at 11:04 pm
    posicionamiento web en google
  63. May 14, 2014 at 8:20 am
    posicionamiento buscadores
  64. May 14, 2014 at 8:35 am
    agencias de marketing
  65. May 14, 2014 at 4:55 pm
    http://www.perthseod.com
  66. May 14, 2014 at 7:45 pm
    http://perthseod.com/
  67. May 15, 2014 at 4:14 am
    life insurance quote
  68. May 15, 2014 at 5:03 am
    Quirk Volkswagen
  69. May 15, 2014 at 9:25 am
    Quirk Volkswagen NH
  70. May 16, 2014 at 1:57 am
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rHhXwjB-sXo
  71. May 16, 2014 at 2:13 am
    Cerame Kia MO
  72. May 16, 2014 at 4:55 am
    Paul Cerame Kia
  73. May 16, 2014 at 5:42 am
    Paul Jim Glover Chevrolet
  74. May 16, 2014 at 7:48 am
    http://www.youtube.com
  75. May 16, 2014 at 11:23 am
    http://www.youtube.com
  76. May 20, 2014 at 8:20 am
    board of labor
  77. May 20, 2014 at 9:18 pm
    federal employment lawyer
  78. May 21, 2014 at 9:55 am
    find a lawyer
  79. May 22, 2014 at 5:32 am
    california labor laws overtime
  80. May 24, 2014 at 6:30 am
    labor board
  81. July 8, 2014 at 2:03 am
    Intelligent Design AC
  82. July 13, 2014 at 3:31 am
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=j69MreBsY2g
  83. July 15, 2014 at 12:55 am
    certified Property Inspection Services
  84. July 15, 2014 at 8:16 am
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iSz_1DZ2d0
  85. July 18, 2014 at 3:02 pm
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuZ1bBDzxDE
  86. September 5, 2014 at 3:25 am
    Windows SA35
  87. September 9, 2014 at 10:45 pm
    women seeking men
  88. September 22, 2014 at 1:37 am
    Abbeyhill builers
  89. October 1, 2014 at 9:20 pm
    Almondvale local conservatory
  90. October 2, 2014 at 1:11 pm
    Rickmansworth Friendly Conservatories
  91. February 24, 2015 at 5:11 am
    filmy online
  92. February 27, 2015 at 3:09 pm
    www.friendlybuilders.co.uk
  93. June 2, 2016 at 12:08 pm
    kc-cu.org

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: