Home
> Breach of Expert Duties, Case Law Studies, Electronic Evidence, Expert Evidence, Expert Witness > Serious Misconduct of Expert Witness: Meadow v General Medical Council (United Kingdom)
Serious Misconduct of Expert Witness: Meadow v General Medical Council (United Kingdom)
January 28, 2010
The Mathematical Theory of Nothing
Comments (0)
-
January 28, 2010 at 10:41 pmModellbau-Marktplatz
MOHAMAD IZAHAM MOHAMED YATIM
Knowledge is Free to Everyone
Everything in here is free of charge." There is no charge for Awesomeness or Attractiveness" - The Dragon Warrior - Kung Fu Panda 1
Research Funds Sponsorship
Requested by my readers who want to sponsor to increase my researches, you are welcome. Please send to The Research Funds Sponsorship into My Paypal Account: donate@qassimbaba.com - Thank you to my donors who sent at least 1USD each to increase my research fund.
Mobile:(006)-019-2787830 IM:codegenius@hotmail.com
Upon requests by my readers, I would like to display my mobile number and IM ID. Visit My Website https://anticyberforensics.wordpress.com
(We Generate Money Out of Chaos and Turbulence)
Scientific Evidence and Law
The contrasts between law and science are often described in binary terms: science seeks truth, the law does justice; science is descriptive, but law is prescriptive; science emphasises progress, whereas the law emphasises process... [C]omparisons between science and the law often celebrate science's unique commitment to systematic testing of observations and its willingness to submit its conclusions to critical probing and falsification. Hence, the Intellect, Reason and Judgment as conclusions and verdicts of the Cognitive Faculties by which laws are prescribed a priori and science is described as the scientific cognition a priori within a posteriori truth. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 'Digital Metadata, Timestamp and The Theory of Relativity' - Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9EW United Kingdom, Published Nov. 2010)
Wissenschaftlicher Beweis und Gesetz
Die Kontraste zwischen Gesetz und Wissenschaft werden häufig in den binären Bezeichnungen beschrieben: Wissenschaft sucht Wahrheit, das Gesetz tut Gerechtigkeit; Wissenschaft ist beschreibend, aber Gesetz ist vorschreibend; Wissenschaft hebt Fortschritt hervor, während t er Gesetz hervorhebt Prozeß... Vergleiche zwischen Wissenschaft und dem Gesetz feiern häufig einzigartige Verpflichtung der Wissenschaft zur systematischen Prüfung von Beobachtungen und seine Bereitwilligkeit, seine Zusammenfassungen beim kritischen Prüfen und bei der Fälschung einzureichen. Folglich wird der Intellekt, der Grund und das Urteil als Zusammenfassungen und Urteilssprüche der kognitiven Lehrkörper, von denen Gesetzen einem priori und eine Wissenschaft vorgeschrieben werden, als das wissenschaftliche Erkennen ein priori innerhalb a posteriori der Wahrheit beschrieben. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, ' Digital Metadata, Zeitstempel und die Theorie Relativität ' - der Universität von Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson von Allee, Cambridge CB3 9EW Vereinigtes Königreich, November 2010)
Évidence et loi scientifiques
Les contrastes entre la loi et la science sont souvent décrits en termes binaires : la science cherche la vérité, la loi fait la justice; la science est descriptive, mais la loi est préscriptive ; la science souligne le progrès, tandis que la loi souligne des comparaisons de processus … entre la science et la loi célébrer souvent l'engagement unique de la science à l'essai systématique des observations et sa bonne volonté de soumettre ses conclusions au sondage et à la falsification critiques. Par conséquent, l'intellect, la raison et le jugement comme conclusions et verdicts des corps enseignant cognitifs par lesquels des lois sont prescrites a priori et la science est décrit comme connaissance scientifique a priori dans a posteriori la vérité. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 'Digital Metadata, horodateur et la théorie d'université de relativité '- de Cambridge, avenue de 15 JJ Thomson, Cambridge CB3 9EW Royaume-Uni, édité novembre 2010)
Evidência e lei científicas
Os contrastes entre a lei e a ciência são descritos frequentemente em termos binários: a ciência procura a verdade, a lei faz a justiça; a ciência é descritiva, mas a lei é prescriptive; a ciência emfatiza o progresso, visto que a lei emfatiza comparações do processo … entre a ciência e a lei comemorar frequentemente o compromisso original da ciência a testar sistemático das observações e o seu voluntariedade submeter suas conclusões a sondar e a falsification críticos. Daqui, o intellect, a razão e o julgamento como conclusões e verdicts das faculdades cognitive por que as leis são prescritas a priori e a ciência são descritos como a cognição científica a priori dentro a posteriori da verdade. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, ' Digital Metadata, timestamp e a teoria da universidade do relativity ' - de Cambridge, avenida de 15 JJ Thomson, Cambridge CB3 9EW Reino Unido, Nov. 2010)
Prova e legge scientifiche
I contrasti fra legge e la scienza sono descritti spesso nei termini binari: la scienza cerca la verità, la legge fa la giustizia; la scienza è descrittiva, ma la legge è normativa; la scienza dà risalto al progresso, mentre la legge dà risalto ai confronti di processo … fra la scienza e la legge celebrare spesso l'impegno unico della scienza alla prova sistematica delle osservazioni e la relativa compiacenza presentare le relative conclusioni al sondaggio ed alla falsificazione critici. Quindi, il intellect, il motivo ed il giudizio come conclusioni e verdetti delle facoltà conoscitive da cui le leggi si prescrivono a priori e la scienza è descritto come la cognizione scientifica a priori all'interno a posteriori della verità. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 'Digital Metadata, timestamp e la teoria dell'università di relatività '- di Cambridge, un viale di 15 JJ Thomson, Cambridge CB3 9EW Regno Unito, pubblicato novembre del 2010)
Научные доказательство и закон
Контрасты между законом и наукой часто описаны в бинарные термины: наука изыскивает правду, закон делает правосудие; наука описательна, но закон прескриптивен; наука подчеркивает прогресс, тогда как закон подчеркивает сравнения процесса ... между наукой и законом часто празднуйте принятие окончательного решения науки уникально к систематический испытывать замечаний и свою готовность представить свои заключения к критически зондировать и фальсифицированию. Следовательно, интеллект, причина и суждение как заключения и вердикты познавательных факультетов которыми законы предписаны a priori и наука описаны как научная познавательность a priori в пределах a posteriori правды. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, ' цифров Metadata, timestamp и теория университета релятивности ' - cambridge, бульвара 15 JJ Thomson, королевства cambridge CB3 9EW соединенного, NOV 2010)
Evidencia y ley científicas
Los contrastes entre la ley y la ciencia se describen a menudo en términos binarios: la ciencia busca verdad, la ley hace la justicia; la ciencia es descriptiva, pero la ley es preceptiva; la ciencia acentúa progreso, mientras que t él ley acentúa proceso… Los omparisons de C entre la ciencia y la ley celebran a menudo la comisión única de la ciencia a la prueba sistemática de observaciones y su buena voluntad de someter sus conclusiones a sondar y a la falsificación críticos. Por lo tanto, la intelecto, la razón y el juicio como conclusiones y los veredictos de las facultades cognoscitivas por quienes los leyes son prescritos a priori y la ciencia se describe como la cognición científica a priori dentro a posteriori de la verdad. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, ' Digital Metadata, timestamp y la teoría de la universidad de la relatividad ' - de Cambridge, avenida de 15 JJ Thomson, Cambridge CB3 9EW Reino Unido, noviembre de 2010)
Prova e legge scientifiche
I contrasti fra legge e la scienza sono descritti spesso nei termini binari: la scienza cerca la verità, la legge fa la giustizia; la scienza è descrittiva, ma la legge è normativa; la scienza dà risalto al progresso, mentre la legge dà risalto ai confronti di processo … fra la scienza e la legge celebrare spesso l'impegno unico della scienza alla prova sistematica delle osservazioni e la relativa compiacenza presentare le relative conclusioni al sondaggio ed alla falsificazione critici. Quindi, il intellect, il motivo ed il giudizio come conclusioni e verdetti delle facoltà conoscitive da cui le leggi si prescrivono a priori e la scienza è descritto come la cognizione scientifica a priori all'interno a posteriori della verità. (Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, 'Digital Metadata, timestamp e la teoria dell'università di relatività '- di Cambridge, un viale di 15 JJ Thomson, Cambridge CB3 9EW Regno Unito, novembre del 2010)
科学的な証拠及び法律
法律と科学間の対照は頻繁に二進言葉で記述されている: 科学は真実を、法律する正義を追求する; 科学は説明的であるが、法律は規定する; t が彼法律プロセスを... 強調する一方、科学は進歩を強調する重大な精査と 偽造に結論を堤出する科学と法律間の比較 は頻繁に観察の組織的テストへ科学の独特な責任及び自発性を祝う。それ故に、法律がアプリオリに規定されると科学はposteriori の真実内の科学的な認知としてアプリオリに記述されている認識能力の結論として知性、理由及び判断そして評決。(Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim 、' デジタルMetadata 、ケンブリッジ、15 JJ Thomson の道、ケンブリッジ CB3 9EW イギリス、2010 年11 月の相対性' - 大学のタイムスタンプ及び理論)
科學證據和法律
對比在法律和科學之間經常被描述用二進制術語: 科學尋找真相, 法律申張正義; 科學是描寫的, 但法律是規定的; 科學強調進展, 但是 法律強調過程... 比較在科學並且法律之間經常慶祝科學的獨特的承諾對系統測試觀察和它的自願遞交它的結論給重要探查和偽造。因此, 智力、原因和評斷作為法律規定演繹認知教職員的結論和定案並且科學被描述作為科學認知演繹在推納真相之內。(Mohamad Izaham Mohamed Yatim, ' 數字式 Metadata, 時間戳和劍橋, 15 JJ Thomson 大道, 劍橋 CB3 9EW 英國相對' - 大學的理論, 被出版2010 11月)
Willard Van Orman Quine
Indiscernibility of Identicals - a logical principle which states that if A and B are identical, every property that belongs to one of them belongs to the other.
Basic Ingredient and Methods of Attack / Defence Cycle in Cyber Forensics Investigations (That Prosecution / Defence Must Establish and Substantiate Before Court):
Possession,
Contents, and
Networking
Possession:
Control, Custody and Knowledge
Contents of Electronic Evidence:
Disclosure, Discovery and Admissibility
Networking:
Local Area Network (LAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), Internet and Broadbands, Satellite and Wireless Comms and etc.
Categories
- Abuse of Process of Court (36)
- Art of Counter-CyberForensics (56)
- Case Law Studies (158)
- Chain of Custody (39)
- Chain of Evidence (39)
- Conspiracy Theory (25)
- Criminal Procedures Code (Act 593) – Malayan Law (27)
- Criminology (24)
- Criminal Behavioral Studies (22)
- Criminal Justice (23)
- Cryptography (12)
- Code Breakers (12)
- Cryptanalysis (12)
- Brute-Force Attack (12)
- Error-Correcting Codes (12)
- One-Way Hash Functions (12)
- Secure Communications (12)
- The Algorithms (12)
- Definition of Possession in Law (25)
- Evidence Act 1950 (Malayan Law) (40)
- S1 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S10 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S11 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S12 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S122 Evidence Act (Communication During Marriage) (27)
- S13 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S14 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S15 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S16 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S17 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S2 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S3 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S4 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S44 Fraud or Collusion in Obtaining Judgement or Incompetency of Court May Be Rise (27)
- S45 Evidence Act 1950 (18)
- S5 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S56 Fact Judicially Noticeable Need To Be Proved (22)
- S57 Facts of Which Court Must Take Judicial Notice (22)
- S6 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S65 Evidence Act 1950 (18)
- S65(1)(c) Evidence Act 1950 (21)
- S7 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S8 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S9 Evidence Act 1950 (22)
- S93 Exclusion of Evidence To Explain or Amend Ambigious Document (23)
- Evidence Not Marked As Exhibit (15)
- Federal Constitutions (21)
- FOREX THEORY (28)
- Chaos Theory (15)
- Bifurcation Theory (9)
- Failure of Gaussian Hypothesis (13)
- Fractal Market Analysis (13)
- Fractal Market Hypothesis (13)
- Fractal Time Series (13)
- Lyapunov Exponent (12)
- Noisy Chaos vs R/S Analysis (13)
- Perturbation Theory (9)
- The Hurst Processes (13)
- Data Analyses (17)
- Gaussian and Non-Gaussian (17)
- Qualitative Analysis (17)
- Quantitative Analysis (17)
- Fluid Dynamics (15)
- Laminar Flow (12)
- Turbulence (15)
- Mathematical Theory of Nothing (17)
- Null Set Theory (16)
- The Non-linear Algorithms (13)
- Neural Fuzzy (15)
- Fuzzy Sets (15)
- Number Theory (17)
- Chaos Theory (15)
- Game Theory (12)
- Geological Forensics Science (13)
- Human Rights (2)
- Human Rights, Marriage & Privacy (35)
- Fundamental Human Rights (20)
- Invasion of Privacy (25)
- Freedom and Privacy (20)
- Freedom of Thought (20)
- Information (20)
- Power and Privacy (20)
- Private Property (20)
- Private Spaces (20)
- Retrospective of Privacy (20)
- Secret of The Bodies (20)
- Territories of Selfness (20)
- Marriage Rights (20)
- S 120 Parties to Civil Suits and Wives and Husbands (22)
- Intellectual Properties & Copyrights (41)
- Law of Tort (46)
- Damages (29)
- Prosecution (43)
- Vicarious Liability (26)
- Marriage & Privacy (2)
- Meteorological Sciences and Analyses (13)
- My Young Padawans on The Moves (13)
- Padawan (13)
- Natural Justice (33)
- Penal Codes (19)
- Scientific Evidence and Law (84)
- Cyber Forensics & Investigations (36)
- Expert Evidence (74)
- Forensics Standards (14)
- The Daubert Test (14)
- The Dyas Test (14)
- The Frye Test (14)
- The Jacobetz Refinement (14)
- The Kelly-Frye Test (14)
- The Kumho Gloss (14)
- The Williams Departure (14)
- Networking and Internet (25)
- Blog (23)
- Domain Names (24)
- E-mail (24)
- Websites (24)
- Solar and Lunar Calculations (13)
- The Source Codes (12)
- The Theory of Pure Democracy (18)
- Trial Within Trial (23)
Archives
- January 2016 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (10)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (12)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (61)
- January 2010 (25)
- December 2009 (1)
Blogroll
- Al-Hadis of Prophet Muhammad SAW
- Al-Quran Karim Online
- Al-Quran, Al-Hadiths & Al-Forensics
- Case Laws
- Chambers and Partners
- Cryptography The Theories – Alice in Wonderland
- Don Mathias’s Criminal Law Blog
- Expert Evidence and Forensics Science
- How To Develop Your Own 64/128/256 Bits Operating Systems
- My Forex Traders
- Naomi Ellenbogen's Littleton Chambers
- The Mathematical Theory of Nothing
- The Omni Farm
- The Wargaming Theory
Recent Posts
- On Deontological Dialectic: My Written Submission January 7, 2016 Kuala lumpur
- 21/9/2015: www.mayashopperz.com – online home shopping at factory prices – free registration for Lifetime with umlimited products to upload
- MYR313,713,713,713.13 – August 13, 2014: WHEN MALICE DEFEATS IMMUNITY (THERE IS NO IMMUNITY WHEN IT HAPPENED TO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION WITH MISCONDUCT OF A MAGISTRATE) – Checkmate in 4 Moves – On The Golden Ratio of Spiral of Fibonacci; Artificial Intelligence + Neural Fuzzy + Emotional Intelligence = Almost Human; Genius Cannot Be Contained
- MYR313,713,713,713.13 – July 13, 2014: Endgame – On Chaotic Ratio – The Spiral of Fibonacci On The Avalanche of Chaotic Universe – The Cause of Avalanche is The Avalanche Itself – N-Person Game Theory – Lanchester Theory
- MYR313,713,713,713.13 – On Self-Agitated (Self-Perturbed) Prime Numbers of My Civil Suit Dated 6.3.2014 (March 6, 2014): Mohamad Izaham Bin Mohamed Yatim v Attorney-General (Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail) and Government of Malaysia plus Anors (Norina Zainol Abidin, Inspektor Siti Mazira Zakaria, Inspektor Mohd Razif Md Zahid, Mazelan Jamaluddin, Nurul Ashiqin Zulkifli, Nur Wahida Md Khairuddin and Zaki Asyraf Zubir). The Philosophy of Mathematics (Mother of All Sciences and Human Thoughts) vs The Philosophy of Law (The Jurisprudence / Scientia Juris (Juristic Theories)). This Civil Suit is About Such A Totally and Purely Malicious Prosecution Had Happened with Absence of All Jurisdiction That Crowning (On Top Of It) The Criminal Trial before “Super-Glamour-You-Magistrate” Zaki Asyraf Zubir. Method of Attack is Based On Deontological Dialectic Approaches (Used by Karl Marx, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Sir Karl Popper and etc.) That Related To Logic and Its Philosophical Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Being, Absence and Nothingness (Nihilism – The Mathematical Theory of Nothing vs Absence of All Jurisdiction), (The Philosophy of Null Set Theory vs The Nullity (Void) of Malaysian Federal Constitution): Socrates, Euclid of Alexandria, Plotinus, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine of Hippo, Thomas Aquinas, Avicenna (Ibnu Sina – Alī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Sīnā), Ibn Arabi (Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn al-ʿArabī al-Ḥātimī aṭ-Ṭāʾī ), Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Francisco Suárez, Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, Baruch Spinoza (born Benedito de Espinosa), Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, René Descartes, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, John Locke FRS, David Hume, Bertrand Arthur William Russell The 3rd Earl Russell, Willard Van Orman Quine, Paul Celan, Jacques Derrida, Jean-Paul Sartre, Alfred Thompson “Tom” Denning, Baron Denning OM PC DL QC, . Want of / Lack of / Absence of Scientific Laws (or Theories / Principles) and Evidence: Scientific Evidence – Scientific Testimonies – Expert Evidence – The Logic of Scientific Discoveries – The Metaphysics of Scientific Phenomena – The Epistemology of Scientific Observations (Empirical Observations / Scientific Methodology / Scientific (or Mathematical) Induction and Deduction: Euclid of Alexandria, Plato, Aristotle, Ibn Haytham – Alhazen (Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham), Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Fārābī (al-Fārābī / Alpharabius), Abū ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī (Algoritmi or Algaurizin – where the word “algorithm” basically came from), Abū al-Rayhān Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Bīrūnī, Abu Mūsā Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber), Muhammad ibn Zakariyā Rāzī (Rhazes or Rasis), Roger Bacon O.F.M., The Bernoullis (The Bernoulli family), Sir Karl Popper, Jules Henri Poincaré, Charles Sanders Peirce, Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz, Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann, Thomas Samuel Kuhn, Albert Einstein, Niels Henrik David Bohr, Erwin Rudolf Josef Alexander Schrödinger, Ian Hacking CC FRSC FBA, Aleksandr Mikhailovich Lyapunov, Hilary Putnam, Pierre-Simon marquis de Laplace (Celestial Mechanics), Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo, Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, Andrey (Andrei) Andreyevich Markov, James Clerk Maxwell FRS FRSE, Ernst Waldfried Josef Wenzel Mach, Bruce Schneier (The Shifu of Cryptography) – Rationalistic Theology, Skepticism, Logical Positivism, Legal Positivisim, Positivism, – Comte, (Isidore-) Auguste (-Marie-François-Xavier), Theology (a priori) ==> Rationalistic Theology ==> Metaphysical Theology ==> Metaphysics ==> Scientific Metaphysics ==> Scientific / Empirical Observations ==> Positivism ==> Logical Positivism ==> Legal Positivism ==> (Positivism vs Realism) ==> Logical Realism ==> Scientific / Legal Realism ==> “Absolute” Realism (a posteriori) – “Keadilan ialah Meletakkan Kebenaran di Tempat Yang Sepatutnya”.
- Prelude into The Greatness of Human Civilization; Mathematics is The Mother of All Sciences and Human Thoughts – Mathematics and Its Mathematical Logic Subdue (both) a priori and a posteriori Truths into the Manifestation of The Theory of Propositional Knowledge – Logic and Philosophical Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology. Only The Real Pure Mathematicians Who Merely Subdue (both) a priori and a posteriori Truths (Absence of Jurisdiction and Absence of All Jurisdictions In The Sense of Evidential and Mathematical Proofs). Synthetic a priori Judgment vs Analytic Judgment; Synthetic Truth vs a posteriori – a priori Truth; Analytical Judgment vs. Synthetical Judgment; The Principle of All Analytical Judgments is The Law of Contradiction; Empirical Judgments are always Synthetical; Mathematical Judgment are All Syntheticals. The Supreme Principle of Law Was Rather Analytic Than That of Morals Is Synthetic (Thus, So-Called Jurisprudence / Scientia Juris (Juristic Theories)); Metaphysics of Ethics = (Metaphysical Elements of Laws + Metaphysical Elements of Morals) to constitute “The Fundamental” (or “Foundation”) between the Metaphysical Elements of Natural Philosophy (Physics or Cosmology or Scientific Knowledge (or Scientific Phenomena or Scientific (Empirical) Observations)) and Jurisprudence / Scientia Juris (The Science of Law), Positivism, Logical Positivism – “Keadilan ialah Meletakkan Kebenaran di Tempat Yang Sepatutnya”.
- CodeGenius V7.0.13 Neural Fuzzy of The Fuzziness: Jimmy Choronology In Da Middle… of Disco Party? – Hey! Jimmy In Da Club – Mere Zindagi Mere Hindustani = Jimmy… Jimmy… Jimmy… (Echoing), Aadja… Aadja… Aadja… (Echoing) – Zindagi Mera Gana…
- DECEMBER 12, 2012: 121212
- November 7, 2012: a priori (Laws) vs a posteriori (Empirical / Scientific Observations) = (Logic + Metaphysics + Epistemology) = Pure Mathematics; The Book of Universe Was Written in The Language of Mathematics
- August 13, 2012: On Golden Ratio – My Son – Abu Yusuf Abdullah Bin Mohamad Izaham was Born on August 13, 2005
- July 13, 2012: On Chaotic Ratio – We Are Preparing Our Civil Suit – Federal Constitutions as The Supreme Laws – On Absence of All Jurisdictions and Malicious Prosecution – Principle Governing Malicious Prosecution – Proofs (Mathematical and Evidential Proofs) – Want of Reasonable and Probable Cause – On Malicious Prosecution and Malice Itselves – Breach of and Inconsistent with Malaysian Federal Constitutions – Court of Judicature Act – Lack / Absence of Scientific Laws and Evidence – Scientific Evidence – Scientific Testimonies – Scientific Explanations – Expert Evidence – The Logic of Scientific Discoveries – The Metaphysics of Scientific Phenomena – The Epistemology of Scientific Observations (Empirical Observations) – Invasion of Privacy – Damages in Malicious Prosecution – Vicarious Liability – High Court Criminal Appeal 41- 21-2011 Against Magistrate Court Decision by Malicious and Misconduct of A Recalcitrant Magistrate and Prosecutions in Case : 2-83-7119-2009 – The Methods of Attack Will Be Based on Deontological Dialectic That Once Used By Immanuel Kant, W. F. Hegel, Sir Karl Popper and Previous Philosophers
- Anarchy, State and Utopia: On Chaotic Ratio – The State of The Art of Holy Jihad (The Prophet’s Way) vs Sun Tzu’s The Art of War – An Epistemological Analysis – From Tactical Guerilla Warfare (Asymmetric Warfare) Towards The Formation (Immobilization of Guerilla Forces) of An Islamic State – Philosophy of War vs Philosophy of Peace (vs Philosophy of The Transition State Between War and Peace)
- Planetary Alignment: Venus Conjunction – ? Mesoamerican Long Count calendar – 13th b’ak’tun – 21 December 2012 – 13 August 3113 BC
- We Generate Money Out of Chaos and Turbulence: Tsunami – Acheh 2012 Earthquake 8.9 Magnitude Off West Coast of Northern Sumatra – This is The Beginning of The End – The End Of Fibonacci Retracement of Acheh Tsunami – The Projectile Paths of The Seismic Causality Equations are Fractals (Self-Similarity On Any Scale of Time Frames) – Data Are Everywhere, The Main Issue is How Do We Interpret and Measure The Results of Its Significance (Statistically or Using Non-Linear Dynamics – Fractal Analysis – Chaos Theory?) – Every Earthquake Had Ever Happened on Earth Shows That The Harmonic Cycles Attained Out of Chaos and Turbulence at (Regardless) Any Time Frame of Reference (Self-Similarity – Fractal – It Happens On Every Celestial Object Within The Universe – Spacetime Continuum) – Self-Perturbed Fibonacci Generalized Equations (Canonical Equations) – Going Back to Pythagoras Who Arranged The Consecutive Notes (Musical Notes-Like) of Harmonic Series (On Each and Every Octave) That Based on Trajectory Movements of Celestial Objects Within The Existence of Our Universe – Prime Number Ratio – Golden Ratio In Fibonacci Sequence – Chaos is An Order But Without Periodicity (In Which, Periodicity Is Hidden (Disolved and Disappeared Within) From Within The Sequence of Gigantic Blocks of Self-Perturbed Prime Numbers and Golden Ratio) – Incomplete Information Theory – Euclid (Euclid of Alexandria – “Elements”), Leonhard Euler, Sir Isaac Newton, Pierre-Simon marquis de Laplace (Celestial Mechanics), The Riemann Hypothesis, Jules Henri Poincaré – Again, I was Born on July 13, 1972 – July is the 7th Month of Complete Cycle Gregorian Calendar – It Happened To Be When I Was Doing My Computational Analyses and Data Simulations between Earthquake and Forex, The Earthquake Data and the Non-Linear Behaviour of The Nature Towards the Space-Time Dimensions on Null Set Theory, My Birthdate Keep Appearing Quantumly and Popped-up Just About Everywhere Within the Data, Then I Figured Out and Postulated That Something About the Coming 13th Malaysian General Election (PRU13) to Elect 7th Prime Minister, I Correlated Among the Blocks of Prime Numbers from Riemann Hypothesis That Based on Null Set Theory and Thus I Found Those Below:
- We Are Preparing Our Civil Suit: Stage 2 – Appointed Prominent Lawyers to Initiate the Suit – We Generate Money Out of Chaos and Turbulence – Fibonacci Number Theory, Chaos Theory, Fractal Space, Fractal Time, Fractal Time Series, Fractal Dimensional Analysis, Fractal Market Analysis, An Introduction to the Fuzziness of Neural Fuzzy in Non-Linear Dynamics of Chaotic Systems (Phase Spaces) – From Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Ibnu Haytham, Ibnu Sina, Al-Farabi, al-Khwarizmi to David Hume, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, Bertrand Russell, and Sir Karl Popper – The Secret, That God Conceals His Secrecy Within The Gigantic (Very Huge) Blocks of Prime Numbers (Throughout The Universe), In Which, He “Encrypted” Every Single Bit of Information Clusters Acquired Just Anything About The Truth of Our Universe – Creatio Ex Nihilo – Null Set (Empty Set / { } / Ø) – The Null Set Theory (My Theory: It Is)
Top Posts
- BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE: LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM, HOSPITAL BESAR PULAU PINANG V UTRA BADI A/L K PERUMAL [2000] 3 MLJ 281 CIVIL APPEAL NO P-01-185 OF 1996 COURT OF APPEAL (KUALA LUMPUR)
- BREACH OF NATURAL JUSTICE: UTRA BADI A/L K PERUMAL V LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM & ANOR [1998] 3 MLJ 676 CIVIL SUIT NO 22-322 OF 1991 HIGH COURT (PENANG)
- Invasion of Privacy: Maslinda bt Ishak v Mohd Tahir bin Osman & Ors [2009] 6 MLJ 826 CIVIL APPEAL NO W-01–156 OF 2008 COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA)
- Computer Printout - Data Through Human Mind: Castle v Cross QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION [1985] 1 All ER 87, [1984] 1 WLR 1372, [1984] Crim LR 682, [1985] RTR 62
- My Written Submission at the Close of Defence Case On 7th of February 2011: The First Magistrate in Malaya Courts Had Been Proved To Be "The Greatest Liar of All Times", and Of Course The Malicious Deputy Public Prosecutor
- Intellectual Property: CREATIVE PURPOSE SDN. BHD. & ANOR. V. INTEGRATED TRANS CORPORATION SDN. BHD. & ORS. HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
- Breach of Natural Justice and Right To Be Heard: LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM HOSPITAL BESAR PULAU PINANG & ANOR V. UTRA BADI K PERUMAL (FEDERAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR)
- My Written Submission On 4th November, 2010 (At the close of prosecution case for prima facie) - KES TANGKAP NO: 2-83-7119-2009: PP v MOHAMAD IZAHAM BIN MOHAMED YATIM
- A Bad Judge: Maharaj v Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago (No 2) PRIVY COUNCIL [1979] AC 385, [1978] 2 All ER 670, [1978] 2 WLR 902
- E-mail and Domain Names: PETROLIAM NASIONAL BHD & ORS V KHOO NEE KIONG (Malaysia)
Top Rated
Top Clicks
- None
Join 33 other subscribers
Blog Statistics
- 167,532 hits
Anti Cyber Forensics
- WordPress Block Patterns Give You Superpowers
- 10 Amazing WordPress Design Resources
- Making 43% of the Web More Dynamic with the WordPress Interactivity API
- WordPress Website Speed Build: The Masters Golf Tournament
- Registering Custom Post Types in the WordPress Admin: Our CloudFest Hackathon Report
- Site-Building Made Simple: Introducing the Public Pattern Library
- 10 WordPress Influencers to Follow in 2024
- Streamlining Your Content Creation: Adding Images From Your Phone With Ease
- A Visit to Where the Cloud Touches the Ground
- 5 Hidden Features of WordPress.com
Recent Comments